Wikia

InuYasha

Lenalia Row

3,523 Edits since joining this wiki
December 11, 2011
  • I live in USA
  • I was born on January 30
52.28.254.12
  Loading editor
  • I am currently having a disagreement with Lord Hyoga concerning what level of speculation is acceptable with regard to adding material to an article. He is telling me that adding material that has no direct evidence to support it into an article is standard practice on this wiki. Now, I'm not certain, but I have always been under the impression that a wiki is not supposed to include information that cannot be conclusively verified. Otherwise, how does one even go about cleaning up articles? I was wondering if you could perhaps clarify this for me, as he seems (assuming Lord Hyoga is a he) to be something of a Sesshomaru fan and it seems to me as though that might be clouding his judgement in this matter. The thread regarding this disagreement is on my talk page if you care to take a look.

    Anyway, thanks for your time.

      Loading editor
    • Just an fyi, you have to put "user:" in front of your name to link. User:Alucard10001

        Loading editor
    • I have never said you don't need "direct evidence" to add material into an article, and you have no grounds for saying that I did. I'm happy to discuss this issue with you, but the fact that you are trying to circumvent that process out of impatience on your part and by putting words in my mouth betrays a profound lack of maturity. If you don't like our policies, you don't have to stay.

        Loading editor
    • How exactly is is circumventing anything to ask someone else who is in charge about the policy? There is no "process" to circumvent because I told you before that I don't care if the change stays or goes. I just want an answer to the question of why and to what degree speculation can be included in articles. I wanted someone else to take a look at the thread so that I could get an impartial answer as to whether or not you had a valid point. I don't have anything against you, but this isn't your wiki. I'm allowed to ask whomever I want whatever questions I want, especially since our conversation appeared to be going nowhere. That includes questions about the policies. And if you think I am being unfair in my presentation, the original thread is still there. Anyone can look at it.

      Also, you have been trying to defend the inclusion of something in an article which has no direct evidence. I can't say it any other way; that's simply what you've been doing. Like I said in my last post on the original thread, give me a source. Give me some evidence other than just your opinion, and this whole thing would become a non-issue. But all you do is to keep giving me speculation, and all I can do is just keep saying that speculation doesn't belong in an encyclopedia article, and that if something can't be proven one way or another, it ought not to be there.

        Loading editor
    • I'm not going to waste my time arguing with you. Your accusations are baseless and nonsensical. You can ask whomever you want questions, but in the context of the situation, it shows that you aren't discussing the issue with me in good faith, but rather are impatiently trying to go to someone else so that they can decide the issue in your favor. But that isn't how things work and it won't exactly make you very popular with anyone here, because it shows you aren't a serious contributor who is willing to abide by consensus, but instead run roughshod over whosoever disagrees with you, traditional ways of doing things be damned.

        Loading editor
    • 52.28.254.12
        Loading editor
  • hi want to be friends

      Loading editor
    • 52.28.254.12
        Loading editor
  • I think that the poll MUST be updated because its been the same for MONTHS

    Please consider

      Loading editor
    • 52.28.254.12
        Loading editor
  • Hey there :) I'll be on chat Saturday at 830 pm PT; if you're not busy I'll be on the chat. Don't worry this'll be the last one of these messages I leave on your wall in case it's annoying xD

      Loading editor
    • 52.28.254.12
        Loading editor
  • Hey :) I will be on chat tmw at 8 pm Pacific Time on chat, if you're free we can chat if you want :)

      Loading editor
    • 52.28.254.12
        Loading editor
  • we need complted manga chapters of inuyasha

      Loading editor
  • Sorry, about your rollback in Hitomiko's master, I do not underastand why these information has been removed, since is officials (name and voice actor of character). Can you read this talk?

      Loading editor
    • 52.28.254.12
        Loading editor
  • We're planning on having another Daimyo-kai soon. Would this weekend work for you?

      Loading editor
    • 52.28.254.12
        Loading editor
  • Hello, we will be holding the next Daimyo-kai next Sunday at 3:35 (UTC), please see if you can attend.

      Loading editor
    • 52.28.254.12
        Loading editor
  • http://inuyasha.wikia.com/wiki/File:HitenKillsTheVixen-C29.jpg

    So... this image was removed once before, a few months ago, and at first I thought its deletion was some kind of misunderstanding or mistake, and along with that, I hadn't gotten around to licensing it yet. Now I've reuploaded it, but now, I think I know why it was deleted. I wonder, is it considered explicit content and is therefore unsuitable to be used on the wiki? I've read over the image policies and there's nothing that states such an explicit image can't be on the wiki. It's from the official InuYasha Manga after all, it's not as though it's fan art or something. Thoughts? HalberdBanryu (talk) 05:36, February 6, 2014 (UTC)

      Loading editor
See archived talk page
Give Kudos to this message
You've given this message Kudos!
See who gave Kudos to this message

Around Wikia's network

Random Wiki